Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 June 30

< June 29	July 1 >

June 30

File:Newbornpromo2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:02, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cover image of a non-notable promo version of the "New Born" single – unnecessary. FamblyCat94 (talk) 00:51, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Björn Kuipers in 2014 FIFA World Cup.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Widr (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:05, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Given as own work but is the same copyright image at http://www.zimbio.com/pictures/ceKDTUcoEjN/Colombia+v+Uruguay+Round+16+2014+FIFA+World/c0g3vJWy7Iq/Bjorn+Kuipers Egghead06 (talk) 04:06, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Egghead06: I've clicked this photo during the live streaming in that match... May be I've misunderstood rules and if that's the case I request you to delete the file quickly... Sorry for the inconveniences!!! If it's any mistake on my part then I apologize but it's an unintentional mistake!! Please delete it if it violates any rule!!! Cricket246 (talk) 04:10, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Twenty one pilots - heathens.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:02, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Image is a non-free album cover for the Suicide Squad sound track, however it is being used as the primary means of identification for he single, Heathens (song). AS this is the cover for the album and not the single, this fails to satisfy WP:NFCC#8, and the rationale itself is invalid as it claims it is the singles art cover. As far as I can tell, there is no artwork specifically for the single. Whpq (talk) 04:14, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Diplo-Press 2016.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:02, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

PR photo that would need OTRS confirmation of release under claimed license. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Diplo-Press 2016.jpg Whpq (talk) 04:36, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Adventure - book cover.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: convert to {{PD-US}}. — ξ ^xplicit 05:04, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Being published in 1911, this book cover almost certainly qualifies for {{PD-1923}}. Doesn't seem to be a newer cover either. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 12:11, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Michael, Brother of Jerry - book cover.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: convert to {{PD-US}}. As the second upload is a photograph and subject to the photographer's copyright, that revision will be deleted. — ξ ^xplicit 05:04, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This book was published in 1917, and it looks like an original copy. Thus the cover would fall under {{PD-1923}} and not {{Non-free book cover}}. I wonder though who took the photo that is the newer version; Lamro, do you know? Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 12:31, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I don't know. I have found the cover via Google search -- tried to find the earliest available. Cheers, Lamro (talk) 17:01, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Burton Barr Central Library.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:02, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The image is of an actual building rather than a proposed one, so it can be replaced with a freely licensed photo of the building (i.e it fails WP:NFCC#1). The rationale claims the photo is freely licensed but without a source link I can't verify this. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 12:34, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - The licensing is very confusing as it is being documented with a fair use rationale but the other information notes state "The author of the image has released the photographic work under a free license, or it is in the public domain: CC by 4.0". The source claimed is "image archive at Will Bruder Architects" without a URL provided. The web site of the firm does have this project available at http://willbruderarchitects.com/project/burton-barr-phoenix-central-library/ with this image present but much less saturated than the one uploaded (but still clearly the same work). there is no indication anywhere on this page or elsewhere on the site that indicates any sort of free license. There is no evidence that this is a free file so a license correction is not viable. With respect to its non-free usage, it is obviously replaceable since we already have File:Phoenix Central Library - North East Corner - 2008-12-27.jpg. -- Whpq (talk) 13:51, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete unless OTRS verification supplied: confusing information template. Either it's free or not and if free we need an OTRS verification, otherwise delete. ww2censor (talk) 17:06, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:WHHeartbreakHotel.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:02, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No license. Removing because the file was A) Not a good representation of the article it was posted on B) It was captured via photo camera. troublednbored (talk) 13:32, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Will Bruder architect.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:02, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Image is claimed as own work, but we would need OTRS confirmation that the uploader holds the copyright as this appears to be a widely circulated publicity photo. See http://downtownphoenixjournal.com/2013/06/24/wire-will-bruder-elected-fellow-of-aia/ for one such usage where the photo crdit simply states "Photo courtesy of Will Bruder Architects." Whpq (talk) 14:03, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:British Gynaecological Cancer Society (logo).png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: convert to fair use. — ξ ^xplicit 05:04, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The crab symbol doesn't seem to satisfy PD-textlogo. Stefan2 (talk) 15:13, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Katharine Smith Reynolds Family Photo.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:02, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Incomplete source: impossible to verify that it was published before 1923 or even taken before that date. This looks like a family photo, so it could easily have remained unpublished for a long time. Stefan2 (talk) 15:29, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Goa Church.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:02, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, low quality. Stefan2 (talk) 16:49, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Prefecture01.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:02, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned historical map of Japan with non-English labels. Because the labels are not English, it is unlikely to be used here in the future. ★ Bigr Tex 19:33, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:FF Logo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:02, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned logo, uploaded for The International Food Festival (London, Ontario), which was deleted by {{proposed deletion}} in 2014 ★ Bigr Tex 20:33, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lettera h.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:02, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unknown country, so the FOP status is unknown. The sculptor is Draft:Walter Noetico who is Italian, but the sculpture might be in another country. Stefan2 (talk) 20:36, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Windfall June 2005.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:02, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned image without enough context to determine encyclopedic use. ★ Bigr Tex 20:42, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Alfa omega 4.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:02, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sculpture in an unknown country, so the FOP status is unknown. The sculptor appears to be Draft:Walter Noetico. Stefan2 (talk) 20:42, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Administrators, Stefan and Jo-Jo Eumerus, With regard to the image Sculpture "Alfa omega", I have uploaded it, for insertion under "clarification needed" for one of the statements at the beginning of text for Walter Noetico Artist, and while preparing the "inline citations" I thought it a good idea to include a visual image of what it is, this Neoilluminist Alphabet which was invented by this Artist. Having uploaded this image, I then was unable to connect it with the page itself, and it was left "floating" on the Commons section. I also, at that time, was unsure of what Licensing tag to use, and left it blank, but later I believe that I did insert a Licence tag to it. As for the FoP, this sculpture is not in a public place. The image of it was given to me by the Artist himself for the purposes of my working on a page creation (together with other numerous hard paper journals, newspaper cuttings, books and art catalogues etc, since his prime activity was in the years way back from the age of internet). Could you kindly revise this matter and your decision please? If you do need an email from Maestro Noetico to confirm his authorisation and permission to use the material, I can arrange for that to be sent. If I made a mistake, I do apologise, because I am quite new to the Wikipedia and am often quite confused by what is the correct and best way of action. I am, however, all atyour disposal to make matters coherent, in good light and in accordance with the rules of Wikipedia. Many thanks for your time and attention. --Richard F Morris (talk) 20:51, 30 June 2016 (UTC) Richard F Morris[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Elevazione mentale.jpeg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:02, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

See c:COM:FOP#France. Stefan2 (talk) 20:43, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Administrators, Stefan and Jo-Jo Eumerus, I did comment the same on the other 2 images, and with regard to the image Sculpture "Elevazione mentale" ("Mental Elevation"), I have also uploaded it, for the same purposes, of inserting under "clarification needed" for one of the statements at the beginning of text for Walter Noetico Artist, and while preparing the "inline citations" I thought it a good idea to include a visual image of what it is, this Neoilluminist Alphabet which was invented by this Artist. Having uploaded this image, I then was unable to connect it with the page itself, and it was left "floating" on the Commons section. I also, at that time, was unsure of what Licensing tag to use, and left it blank, but later I believe that I did insert a Licence tag to it. As for the FoP, this sculpture is not in a public place. The image of it was given to me by the Artist himself for the purposes of my working on a page creation (together with other numerous hard paper journals, newspaper cuttings, books and art catalogues etc, since his prime activity was in the years way back from the age of internet). Could you kindly revise this matter and your decision please? If you do need an email from Maestro Noetico to confirm his authorisation and permission to use the material, I can arrange for that to be sent. If I made a mistake, I do apologise, because I am quite new to the Wikipedia and am often quite confused by what is the correct and best way of action. I am, however, all atyour disposal to make matters coherent, in good light and in accordance with the rules of Wikipedia. Many thanks for your time and attention. --Richard F Morris (talk) 20:55, 30 June 2016 (UTC) Richard F Morris[reply]

Delete Copyrighted artistic work (the artist is still alive), without authorisation for publication. Possibly a copyviol. --Ruthven (talk) 17:55, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Enemylogic.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:02, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned image, likely unencyclopedic. Uploaded for use on Enemy Logic (AfD). ★ Bigr Tex 20:45, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Community Resilience Mapping Tool.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:02, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Missing evidence of permission FASTILY 21:17, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

OTRS received for cc-by-sa-3.0. Kharkiv07 (T) 02:42, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Vivekananda Ashrama (2009).jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:02, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The file information page was not edited by the uploader, so we don't know whether the image is licensed or not, although the edit summary seems to contain a source. The copyright tag refers to an older file, uploaded when this was at File:Vivekananda.jpg and later deleted under WP:F8. Stefan2 (talk) 21:47, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Commandos 2 - Man of Courage screenshot (Mission 2 - Das Boot, Silent Killers).jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:02, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails WP:NFCC#1. NFUR for use in Real-time tactics tautologically states that the image is not replaceable because "No free replacement is available." Because the intent of the image is "to display gameplay of real-time tactics video game genre", a free replacement for this purpose could be obtained from a game that is freely licensed or an OTRS. RJaguar3 | u | t 22:15, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - List of open-source video games has more than one rts listed with free content licenses so this is replaceable with free content. --Whpq (talk) 22:27, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

June 30

zproxy.org